When I search Google, this is my result of over 4 million results.
When I compare the two — the top two on Google are actually from the project itself. Then, on the Google engine there is a 2006 post from Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach that uses the term “flat classroom” and is highly linked, but really, it is not too current.
Then, on Cuil, the wiki isn’t even indexed. (I have a feeling that wikispaces isn’t there yet.) However, the Ning does show up with an interesting graphic on the top left corner that says “My Success in Scientology” — it says the image is coming from the Ning, but I cannot find that image anywhere. I really don’t like the image and wonder if it is advertising, but yet, clicking on the image takes me to the ning. So, although including a graphic is nice, it should be relevant and from the proper site.
When I take a look at preferences on the engine, this is what I get:
Just basic preferences are available here.
Drilling down, their start page:
Let’s look at the categories for my name:
I did see it once, but now it is gone. (perhaps they are updating their own site?)
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Never miss an episode
Get the 10-minute Teacher Show delivered to your inbox.











3 comments
Its a little ironic you wrote about this today. I was playing around with Cuil this morning to test it out compared to Google and was pretty disappointed with the results.
What makes it ironic is that I was searching top edubloggers with the term blog to see if I got good hits. I was pretending to be someone who sat in one of your presentations and wanted to look up your blog after I was done. I ended up testing you (among about 5 others) by typing in “vicki davis blog.” On many, I didnt get any valid results on the front page, on yours I got a hit but its to a specific post and not your main blog home page. In fact, Warlick’s is the only one whose main blog home page came up using the same search terms.
On Google, your blog home page comes up on the 2nd link so seems more effective.
By no means a scientific approach, but will stick with Google for now and continue to play around while hoping for improvements.
I used to really like Northern Light. When I was doing my Masters research project – and Google was still in Beta, it was Google & Northern LIght that really impressed.
I’ve just found the site that I created about search engines for the project (it was for child health care workers to learn how to search) – and found a link to an older version of Northern Light – all via archive.org. ( http://web.archive.org/web/20011026020509/http://www.emmadw.ukgateway.net/pages/simp-ser.htm#try has the link to the older version of Northern LIght, though even that’s different from when I first created the site in 1999 – it’s just that was the earliest page that they had on archive.org)
hey there, this is pretty kooo stuff, but you must also take a look at http://www.it-india.com for more info on different type of Search Engines…
regards…:)
Comments are closed.